Image 01

emmanation

You like me! Of course, you probably don't know me very well.

Archive for the ‘aren’t we gorgeous?’ Category

YOUR LADY WANTS A DIAMOND

Thursday, December 2nd, 2010

Actual quote from a Shane Co radio commercial.

A few years from now her ears won’t have grown, but her desire for a larger diamond will.

What does that mean? No, really. I know it had a little more context than that. It seemed to have something to do with earmuffs, of all things – like, you can buy her earmuffs but is that a gift that has the potential to keep on giving?

This is a season of endless jewelry advertising. There are gifts to be given and there is the potential for romance. Any man with a woman in his life is told that sparkles are de rigueur. Any woman with a man in her life who ends up without said sparkles is left wondering if maybe her man doesn’t love her as much as that cute foreign guy in the Jared commercial loves his lady.

I’ve grown accustomed to said advertising. I don’t particularly like it, and that’s mostly because I’m not immune to a little emotional manipulation, but I can usually tune it out (or change the station).

However.

Now? Not only are diamonds required, now you have to give/get jewelry that can be upgraded every couple of years?

Last season, women were superficial folks who needed glittery gifts to be happy.

This season, not only do our gifts need to be glittery, they also need to be able to grow as our desire for larger diamonds does?

Why will I want a larger diamond next year?

Because Shane Co will tell me I do.

It’s a diabolical plan, really.

Diamond Company Four Part Plan:

  1. We say women want diamonds. We say it loudly and enthusiastically and A LOT and eventually you will believe it, so you might as well just accept it. Women want diamonds.
  2. The diamond you’re buying now, person who is shopping for a woman, is fine for this year, but next year we’re going to tell her that it’s too small. We will say it a lot. You will hear it in your dreams. You might as well just accept it.
  3. Instead of buying something that will just languish away in a jewelry box embarrassed by it’s  tininess, buy jewelry that you can put bigger diamonds in! We’ll take your old diamonds back (probably) and sell them to someone that you’re clearly better than!
  4. Repeat.

I have an alternate plan.

  1. Men: hop on the first plane to Bangkok, because that’s where the Golden Jubilee Diamond is. It’s 545 carats, so whichever one of you gets there first will probably be able to keep your diamond needing lady happy for quite some time. Spare no expense and probably bring some machine guns, because I doubt it’s actually for sale. Based on what I’ve learned from advertisers, a diamond larger than her fist will probably lead to tears and also sex. (It’s not 100% clear if those two things will happen at the same time, but since you probably just killed a bunch of guards to get the damned diamond, do you really care?)
  2. Um… yeah, I covered it all in step 1.

P.S. Crockett, I don’t want diamonds – upgradable or otherwise. Unless they’re brown. Because those things are fucking gorgeous.

P.P.S. Ok, I’m kidding about the brown diamond thing.

P.P.P.S. Probably.

snap crackle pop

Friday, November 19th, 2010

Yesterday, I had a few minutes to kill and I was in the vicinity of a Sephora.

I have as much makeup as I need, at the moment, because … well, actually, I’ve basically always had as much makeup as I needed. I don’t have as much makeup as I want, because I have absolutely NO SHINY GOLD EYESHADOW, but since I have nowhere to wear shiny gold eyeshadow, wanting is not even close to translating into needing.

I guess I could wear it to school… I digress.

Since I’m all set in the makeup department, I swung by the hair section. The humidity in Colorado has dropped to  – well, currently it’s 9% here in Louisville. 9%. Do you know what that does to ones hair, if ones hair is even a little bit inclined to be dry?

The girl in Sephora tried to convinced me to buy this conditioner.

Oh, it smelled delicious. It can be used as a leave in, in the shower, whenever. It is apparently a hair miracle in a jar.

It’s also $38.

Six months ago, I would have bought it. I would have been pissed about how much it cost, but I would have paid for it anyway, because I’ve filed my dry hair under ‘a problem that needs to be fixed’. I would have justified the purchase by saying, ‘well, I could buy a bunch of crappy conditioners and waste plastic and money and time, or I could just buy the one that will work’.

That, y’all, was my version of financial independence. Getting to buy minor luxuries that were a little bit ridiculous. I didn’t buy a sports car. I didn’t buy Louboutins. I bought expensive conditioner.

I miss my moisturized hair. I do not miss my job.

Fair trade, I guess.

Conference

Friday, November 5th, 2010

Dear Colorado Celebration of Women in Computing,
Thank you for taking me dancing last night. Thank you for the unlimited coffee this morning – I’m going to need it for the hours of talks that are forthcoming.
One thing.
The t-shirts are a great idea, but NO one looks good in aqua. I’m sitting in a room full of women who are currently proving it.
Love,
Emma

here’s the thing

Wednesday, October 13th, 2010

My plan this week was to review all six blogs mentioned in the Marie Claire article.

I’m not going to do that, for two very good reasons. The first is that this is the week of midterms, and I have no idea what the hell I was thinking. Crockett has seen nothing but the back of my head, my brain literally feels like a muscle that I’ve over-exercised, and I haven’t taken a single test yet.

The other, better reason, is that I feel like sort of an asshat.

I let Marie Claire, a magazine that currently has a photoshop yourself ‘virtual weightloss tool’ on their homepage, suggest to me that some women were doing something wrong. Some women that do what I do every day – give some lovin to the internets and hope to get some in return.

Remember that day when I drew a silly picture? Or that day that I was freaking miserable and wrote some barely coherent a blah-didi-blah? Or that plethora of days when I purposely didn’t write about something that was going on, because it was was too painful or because it would make me sound like a whiner or because it was as much Crockett’s secret or Star’s secret or someone else’s secret as mine?

What I’m trying to say is that these women, the two that I already wrote about and the four that I didn’t, are doing their best, and they’re sharing those attempts. I don’t know what I expected, but I didn’t find thinly veiled references to pro-ana lifestyles. I found  some chicks who I would totally run with during a marathon. At least, until mile 18. At mile 18 I get mother fucking cranky and none of them would want to run with me.

Anyway, sorry. I’m sorry for not finishing if you were interested, and I’m sorry for starting if you already knew what I discovered.  I am glad I found out for myself, though.

Day 1: Carrots ‘n’ Cake

Tuesday, October 12th, 2010

In case you missed it yesterday, this week I’m reviewing the ‘big six’ bloggers that Marie Claire recently suggested may be promoting unhealthy eating. Earlier today I talked about Kath Eats.

Carrots ‘n’ Cake is written by Tina, who lives in Boston. (I would really like to go to Boston some day.) She’s married to a nice seeming fella named Mal, and they have a pug named Murphy. Her blog has led to a book deal, which basically makes her the queen of the universe.

It was hard for me to approach this blog with my serious face on, because Murphy is adorable, but I did my best.

Like Kath, Tina gained weight in her early twenties and has now lost it. Perhaps all ‘healthy living’ bloggers follow this format? This actually happened to me too. I gained weight in the last year of college and the first two after I graduated, and one day I woke up and realized I was a smidge heavier than I’d realized.

Not that I said ‘than I’d realized’ – not ‘than I should be’.  About her weight gain, Tina said something similar, but with a different spin.

I saw photos from our trip. Looking at the physical proof, I was embarrassed by how much weight I had gained. Every photo was a “bad” photo of me. I was so depressed that I threw most of them away.

Both  of the blogs I’ve looked at today have that same theme. That weight is embarrassing and that thinness will lead to approval. This, right here, is the theme that I was hoping not to find in these blogs. I wanted to find that these women were eating and running and writing about it without talking about how much better it made them look. Obviously, that was somewhat unrealistic.

I was a chubby kid and sort of stretched out in high school (prior to my post college shape change). I remember my father giving me a workout and diet book, and one of the tips was ‘eat fewer calories. If you normally eat two pieces of chicken, eat one. If you normally eat one, eat half.’ I was twelve or thirteen and I expressed to my dad that she didn’t seem to have put in a lower bound, and that that sounded like anorexia waiting to happen. He said that no, that’s just how you lose weight – you eat less. Technically true, sure, but not the best way to approach health and nutrition.

I dig that Tina doesn’t seem touting the ‘eat less’ philosophy. There are no pictures of muffins with a single bite taken out (ahem, Kath) – instead, there are cupcakes and lattes and big bowls of oatmeal. Overall, I like this one and have actually added it to my RSS feed. Triggers? 0.