Image 01

emmanation

You like me! Of course, you probably don't know me very well.

Archive for the ‘yum’ Category

Day 1: Carrots ‘n’ Cake

Tuesday, October 12th, 2010

In case you missed it yesterday, this week I’m reviewing the ‘big six’ bloggers that Marie Claire recently suggested may be promoting unhealthy eating. Earlier today I talked about Kath Eats.

Carrots ‘n’ Cake is written by Tina, who lives in Boston. (I would really like to go to Boston some day.) She’s married to a nice seeming fella named Mal, and they have a pug named Murphy. Her blog has led to a book deal, which basically makes her the queen of the universe.

It was hard for me to approach this blog with my serious face on, because Murphy is adorable, but I did my best.

Like Kath, Tina gained weight in her early twenties and has now lost it. Perhaps all ‘healthy living’ bloggers follow this format? This actually happened to me too. I gained weight in the last year of college and the first two after I graduated, and one day I woke up and realized I was a smidge heavier than I’d realized.

Not that I said ‘than I’d realized’ – not ‘than I should be’.  About her weight gain, Tina said something similar, but with a different spin.

I saw photos from our trip. Looking at the physical proof, I was embarrassed by how much weight I had gained. Every photo was a “bad” photo of me. I was so depressed that I threw most of them away.

Both  of the blogs I’ve looked at today have that same theme. That weight is embarrassing and that thinness will lead to approval. This, right here, is the theme that I was hoping not to find in these blogs. I wanted to find that these women were eating and running and writing about it without talking about how much better it made them look. Obviously, that was somewhat unrealistic.

I was a chubby kid and sort of stretched out in high school (prior to my post college shape change). I remember my father giving me a workout and diet book, and one of the tips was ‘eat fewer calories. If you normally eat two pieces of chicken, eat one. If you normally eat one, eat half.’ I was twelve or thirteen and I expressed to my dad that she didn’t seem to have put in a lower bound, and that that sounded like anorexia waiting to happen. He said that no, that’s just how you lose weight – you eat less. Technically true, sure, but not the best way to approach health and nutrition.

I dig that Tina doesn’t seem touting the ‘eat less’ philosophy. There are no pictures of muffins with a single bite taken out (ahem, Kath) – instead, there are cupcakes and lattes and big bowls of oatmeal. Overall, I like this one and have actually added it to my RSS feed. Triggers? 0.

Living healthy, living thin

Monday, October 11th, 2010

We’re putting on our serious faces again today, people.

I know. But we have some important things to discuss.

I’m referring to the Marie Claire article, The Hunger Diaries.

Marie Claire caused some serious OMIGOD ITSTHEENDOFTHEWORLD issues in a certain blogging community lately. Just as there are mommy bloggers, there are ‘healthy living’ bloggers. The bloggers aren’t people who write about food because of food itself – they are instead people who write about what they eat and how much they exercise, how they take care of their nutritional needs and manage their weight, and sometimes, how you can do it too. The article Marie Claire published suggested that maybe, these bloggers weren’t promoting a healthy lifestyle as much as you might hope.

The article focused on the ‘big six’ of this community. (You can find them here, here, here, here, here and here, if you’re interested.) They’re all women, as are the majority of the readers and writers of these types of blogs, and they’re open with things like their height, their weight, and their struggles to exercise and eat healthy.

Marie Claire suggested that these women are, at best, occasionally practicing disordered eating, and that at worst they are encouraging other women to do the same.

I have intentionally never listed my height and weight on this blog, even though I blog about body image regularly. If you’re a regular reader, you know I’m a shorty, and hopefully that’s about it.

I have also recovered from an eating disorder.

I think this makes me the perfect person to review these websites. I am, in fact, fairly easily triggered. When I was in the thick of it, I would check out armloads of cookbooks from the library, reading them, looking at pictures, and even transcribing the recipes. I did this in lieu of actually eating intelligently, and there was absolutely nothing sensible about that. I can read about food, now. I regularly do so, if for no other reason than exposure – if I see pictures of and read about deliciousness every day, I’m less likely to be surprised by something that makes me feel like I used to. I even have a blog of pictures of things that I eat, although I’m quite the slacker about keeping it updated.

The last thing I want is to do or say or write something that would ever in the history of ever contribute to an unbalanced view of food and eating and health that someone else might have. Most of these women, since the publication of the article, have expressed a similar opinion.

Maybe they just don’t know, though. If they never had a full blown disorder, maybe they’re not familiar with the disordered eating that can follow a woman through her whole life without ever being diagnosed. Or, maybe they’re actually teaching healthy food and healthy living and the Marie Claire article picked a few bad examples. Or? Maybe they are in fact touting an unhealthy lifestyle with the main goal being thinness.

Without reading them, I can’t say for sure.

I’m devoting this week to reviewing each of these sites. I’ll go into their archives, since they’re likely being more attentive to this issue since the publication of the article. I’ll take into account any statement they may have made in their own defense.

Will this end up meaning anything to anyone? Perhaps not. Maybe by the end of the week I’ll be a convert, and Mangled Baby Duck will be the newest of the ‘healthy living’ blogs. Either way, I want to know. I want to know if our societal obsession with weight has led to an entire corner of our internets being quite publicly turned into a community for those with borderline eating disorders. Because? It means something to me.

how I hate you, jiggly milk

Tuesday, August 24th, 2010

I am Italian and I am proud of it. I love being Italian. I love throwing around any possible Mafia heritage when it’s worth a laugh and I love feeling like I’m doing justice to my DNA when I eat too much pasta.

What I don’t love is panna cotta.

If you’ve never had it, panna cotta is sort of a custard. It’s not thickened with eggs, like the creme in a creme brulee, and it’s not thickened with air, like sabayon.

It’s thickened with gelatin.

Let me walk you through this. The Italians had some bad ass food. Hell, they had ricotta, a cheese so delicious it’s practically a dessert in and of itself. When they started seeing custards coming out of France, they thought ‘hm, that looks tasty’. However, rather than mastering the rather intense prevention of curdling that such custards require, they thought, ‘what the hell, let’s just use fish bones’.

The fish bones were a source of gelatin, and they certainly did thicken the sweet milk.

Leading to MILK JELLO.

MILK JELLO, people. Say that out loud. Think about it. Take it into your soul. Do whatever you need to do to realize that MILK JELLO is not a good idea.

Milk Jello is disgusting. It’s sure as hell not custard. It’s jiggly milk.

Milk should not jiggle. Milk that jiggles has expired and needs to be thrown out.

Panna cotta? You’re ruining my pride in being Italian.

Don't be fooled by its pretty exterior. It's JIGGLY MILK, people.

cookies for breakfast? you CRAZY!

Wednesday, June 16th, 2010

No really, I’m eating cookies for breakfast. They’re delicious. Really, really delicious. And also healthyish. So, in the spirit of sharing things that are delicious and healthyish, I’m going to give you the recipe, so that you too can have cookies for breakfast.

This is loosely adapted from the Banana Chocolate Chip Oatmeal Cookie recipe in Tish Boyle’s The Good Cookie.

Wet ingredients:

1 stick butter, room temperature
2/3 cup firmly packed brown sugar
1/3 cup white sugar (replace with brown, if you want, or use this as a place to try something fun like muscavado – your cookies will just get chewier and more delicious)
1 egg
2 tsp vanilla

Dry ingredients:

1.5 cups whole wheat pastry flour
1/4 tsp baking soda
2 tsp baking powder
1/2 tsp salt
1.5 cups rolled oats (quick cooking or otherwise – I prefer otherwise)

Awesome ingredients:

1 mediumish banana, peeled, chopped into half inch pieces, and put into the freezer
8 oz (about 2/3 of a bag) semisweet chocolate chunks
Nuts, if you must. No more than a cup. I wouldn’t if I were you… but that’s me.

Heat your oven to 375.

Start with your wetties. Throw the butter and sugars together into a bowl and beat them until they’re all mixed up and fluffy and look like little brownish buttery clouds of love. Add the egg and the vanilla and scrape it all together, then beat until it’s all mixed up again. Make sure there are no unmixed chunks of butter, because those will confuse you later.

Now, mix the dry ingredients together in a separate bowl if you’re that kind of person. I’m not, so if you want to just throw them all in on top of your butter-sugar lovin, go right on ahead. Mix until it’s all combined – it will be thick and a little bit sticky.

Now, put in your chocolate chips and your hopefully-mostly-frozen-banana chunks. We froze the banana because we wanted it to stay in pieces, rather than get all smooshed into the dough – this way when you eat it, you’ll have little joyous baked banana bites. Mix as little as you possibly can while still getting good chocolate/nanner distribution. The bananas will look like butter that didn’t get mixed in, which is why it’s SUPER important that you triple check for actual unmixed butter above.

Now, I like my breakfast cookies huge, but you can make these normal sized if you want. If you want the gigantic ones, scoop out a quarter of a cup of dough, roll it into a ball, put it on your cookie sheet, and then smoosh it down just a smidge. These aren’t going to spread a lot, so even with the big ones two inches between them is fine. If you want to go little, use a rounded tablespoon and do the same thing.

Big cookies bake for ~15 minutes, little ones ~12 minutes. They’re done when the edges are starting to turn light brown.

Now, eat them for breakfast. It will make you happy. Trust me.

just in time for memorial day

Saturday, May 29th, 2010

It’s a holiday weekend. If you’re not already drinking, you should be! Here is a handy dandy chart I’ve created to help you decide what you should be drinking between sunrise and noon.